[Openroad-users] App Server performance

[Kim Ginnerup]

Another catch that we have seen, is that if you want to take a server offline, by Disabling it, You might end up with a client that is starting the 

ASO instance eventhough you have stopped it ad disabled it. I guess because it does not pickup that it is disabled.

We have seen this from a java client that start the aso which get killed, then start another one which get killed. The rate you can start and kill an ASO is quite impressive.  ;-)

That Java client did one nameserver lookup and kept the info so it could do its own connection after that, primarily done for performance.

Bad idea.

 

Kim

 

________________________________

Fra: openroad-users-bounces at peerlessit.com [mailto:openroad-users-bounces at peerlessit.com] På vegne af Martin Pomej
Sendt: 2. november 2006 00:24
Til: OpenROAD Users
Emne: [Openroad-users] App Server performance

 

Hello OR world,

 

Talking about windows clients communicating to a windows 2003 server, has anyone noticed any performance gains by using either a name server connection ie ASONameServer.Connect or a direct connection ie RemoteServer.Initiate?

 

I understand that by using a name server you get the advantage of load balancing, but currently I'm after performance.

 

Regards, 
Martin Pomej 
MyWorkplace Solutions Pty Ltd 
Ph:     1300 733 731 
Mob:    0414 230 845 
Em:     martin.pomej at myworkplace.com.au 
Making Service our Priority 
www.myworkplace.com.au <http://www.myworkplace.com.au/>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://peerlessit.com/pipermail/openroad-users/attachments/20061104/4ba3a7de/attachment.html